The previous post, “What is certain is that property is to be regenerated among us,” has spurred some further research on the relation of The Theory of Property to Proudhon’s works of the early 1860s. Check the comment thread for a number of of interesting items from Proudhon’s correspondence, and the Libertarian Library blog for the “Notice to the Reader” from The Principle of Art, the first of the Posthumous Works.
Related Articles
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Contrun-mag.jpg?resize=326%2C245&ssl=1)
Contr'un
How does property become capitalist?
Contrun Revisited: One of the tasks of this phase of work on Contr’un, and one of the purposes of the Contr’un Revisited project, is to find the dangling threads, of which there have been many, […]
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/185198_264931033610567_420255763_n.jpg?resize=326%2C245&ssl=1)
Contr'un
“What Is Property?” vs “Theory of Property”?
From the Proudhon-seminar list: I took a trip into Portland today, to check in at the radical bookstore where I’m volunteering and to look over some untranslated material in a fresh setting. It always seems […]
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/distrib-proudhon.jpg?resize=326%2C245&ssl=1)
Proudhon Library
A passage missing from “The Theory of Property”
PROJECT: Principles of Nationality and Property I think that most of the concerns that readers have had regarding The Theory of Property have involved the possibility that something alien to Proudhon’s thought might have been […]