The previous post, “What is certain is that property is to be regenerated among us,” has spurred some further research on the relation of The Theory of Property to Proudhon’s works of the early 1860s. Check the comment thread for a number of of interesting items from Proudhon’s correspondence, and the Libertarian Library blog for the “Notice to the Reader” from The Principle of Art, the first of the Posthumous Works.
Contr'un
Varieties of “theft” and “property”
[one_third padding=”0 10px 0 0″] Contr’un Revisited: [commentary coming soon] [/one_third][two_third_last padding=”0 0px 0 10px”] It’s generally nice to avoid taking complex problems and making them even more complex—but not always. There may be some […]
Contr'un
Proudhon on possession, 1840
I see that Francois Tremblay has again raised the issue of the distinction between property and possession, citing db0 (citing Proudhon, and ultimately intervening in an old debate about Kevin Carson’s work on Roderick Long’s […]
French texts
Ms. 2847 — Théorie de la propriété
[…] [36] Donner une analyse exacte et ferme de toutes mes critiques, Ier Mémoire, 1840 2e Mémoire, 1841 3e Mémoire, 1842 Création de l’ordre, 1843 Contradictions économiques, 1845 Le Peuple, etc., etc., 1848-1852 De la […]