Becoming Anarchists, Constructing Anarchisms Preface If asked, I generally say that I have been an anarchist for close to thirty years. And because of all the other things that I have been for much longer—a […]
We are proposing anarchism as something that we can make our own, meaning that, in a certain sense, we can each make our own anarchism. Thus, there will be anarchisms, in the plural, that we must learn to identify by their shared characteristics. Part of our task here will be to establish the elements that must be defined in order to present an anarchism. But, in order to be recognizable as an anarchism, each instance must present itself as not just logically or ideologically complete and consistent, but also as intelligible within patterns of historical development. […]
There are plenty of useful histories of anarchism, including some general histories that draw from the anarchist past the material by which various conceptions of anarchism might be bolstered and enriched. And the more we know about the complexities of the anarchist past, the less, I think, we can begrudge ourselves or our fellow anarchists these ideological and organizational supports. We pick and choose among the various available narratives on the basis of various kinds of present utility. Sometimes we are more scrupulous and demanding with regard to the accuracy of those various histories or the amount of the anarchist past for which they can account. Sometimes we fall back on a familiar “keep what works and discard the rest” standard—with or without real connection to anarchism’s experimentalist tendencies. […]
Ce qui nous sépare de Nietzsche. C’est dans notre lutte contre la passion professorale pour le passé, que nous renions violemment l’idéal et la doctrine de Nietzsche. Je tiens à démontrer ici que les journaux […]
Copyright © 2024 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes